The Great Reset
The idea that history moves in a smooth, linear progression is one of the most deeply embedded assumptions taught through formal education. Civilizations are presented as developing gradually, one invention leading neatly to the next, each era improving upon the last. This model is useful, but it is not stable. When examined closely, history shows repeated interruptions, compressions, and resets rather than continuity.
One way to approach the concept of a “Great Reset” is not as a single hidden event, but as a structural reorganization of society that redefines value, ownership, labor, time, and identity. From this perspective, the modern world appears less like an organic evolution and more like a deliberately constructed system layered over an obscured past.
A critical turning point occurs in the late 18th century. In 1776, the United States was formally established. Within a very short time span, foundational systems were put in place that still define the modern world. In 1792, only sixteen years later, the Buttonwood Agreement created what would become the New York Stock Exchange. This formalized abstract ownership, speculation, debt instruments, and market-driven value as central organizing principles of society.
What followed is difficult to reconcile with the standard narrative of slow development. Across North America, large-scale urban centers appeared rapidly. Massive stone and brick buildings, government structures, train stations, factories, and institutional architecture were constructed at a pace that strains conventional explanations, particularly when considering the supposed technological and logistical limitations of the time. Many of these structures appear suddenly, fully formed, with little visible developmental precedent.
At the same time, an extraordinary concentration of “firsts” occurred. Systems for banking, insurance, standardized measurements, industrial production, patent control, compulsory education, centralized governance, and mass media emerged in quick succession. Electricity, telecommunications, mechanized transport, chemical manufacturing, and industrial agriculture followed within a compressed historical window. The world transitioned almost overnight into a fully metered environment.
Measurement itself became a tool. Time was standardized. Labor was quantified. Distance was priced. Energy was commodified. Resources were assigned units, costs, and ownership. Even human productivity was reduced to output metrics. This shift did not simply improve efficiency; it redefined reality in economic terms. Value became externalized, abstracted, and controlled through systems few people directly understood.
This restructuring coincided with widespread conflict. The 19th and early 20th centuries were marked by near-constant wars, revolutions, territorial reassignments, and population displacement. Wars do not only destroy people and infrastructure; they erase records, collapse institutions, and sever cultural memory. After each conflict, rebuilding occurs under new rules, often enforced by debt, treaties, and centralized authority.
Education systems were formalized during this same period. Public schooling standardized what was taught, how it was taught, and which knowledge was excluded. History was simplified into timelines, dates, and approved narratives. Complexity was removed. Discontinuities were smoothed over. Alternative interpretations were labeled unscientific, unimportant, or irrelevant. What could not be easily categorized was omitted.
This matters because control over education is control over perception. When history is presented as linear and inevitable, structural resets disappear from view. When economic systems are framed as natural outcomes rather than deliberate designs, their underlying assumptions go unchallenged. When measurement becomes synonymous with reality, anything unmeasurable is dismissed.
The modern capitalist, consumer-based world did not emerge passively. It required infrastructure, law, enforcement, compliance, and belief. It required populations to accept debt as normal, labor as identity, growth as necessity, and consumption as purpose. These ideas were not discovered; they were taught, reinforced, and normalized over generations.
Seen this way, the “Great Reset” is not a single event but a layered construction. It is the replacement of older frameworks with systems that prioritize control, predictability, and extraction. It is the conversion of land into property, time into currency, knowledge into credential, and life into economic participation.
Another shift accompanied this restructuring is the focus of human development moved away from inner discipline, self-knowledge, and alignment with natural systems, and toward external, technical control. Progress became defined almost exclusively by machines, tools, speed, and output. Human capacity itself — perception, awareness, health, resilience, and consciousness — was treated as secondary or irrelevant. What could not be mechanized or monetized was gradually pushed aside.
Education systems reinforced the idea that “modern” meant technological, industrial, and artificial, while attention to nature, the body, and inner development was framed as primitive, outdated, or unscientific. Ancient practices concerned with balance, self-mastery, and internal order were reduced to superstition or spirituality. The result was a population trained to improve systems, but not itself.
The pattern suggests the presence of a single controlling group operating by design rather than chance. A better way of living probably existed before this system was imposed, and it was deliberately replaced. This transition can be understood as a shift from good to Evil.
